Sum would cheer...

the* death of Keynesian Economics, but a super Congress? Compromise is the art of not making anyone truly happy. Not to mention metaphor happy, or blossom.

[8-1-11: Debt Deal[!]
OurFuture.org , The White House, Paul Krugman, AmericanProgress.org

Winner?
Obama(& Bane Or)
and Compromise & Filibuster
(The Table and Partisanship).

Loser?
The country
and the economy.

Not to mention:
O
'N[!]
Joe.]

[*]pun will lose
[Re: The Table, with Andrea Mitchell, Chuck Todd(paraphrased)...those who oppose the deal will roar in primaries not in the general] that puts the sword of Damocles on the people and in their votes.]

[My sum mary: the sum will cheer...BULLY[!]

[And some will whine. EXTREME RHETORIC ALERT for link one of the previous three. While in all actuality, I can agree that people are dying, and there are forces alligned against the common good to blame, I cannot use the Hitler analogy that LaRouche utilizes, though the results do border on treason, it is for the people to decide not a determination that can be legally formed. Glass-Steagall is probably one solution, and the offensive PDF probably summarizes the deal accurately, and the only good thing that can come from this hyper-rhetoric is if it works, but it should not make too many people happy that it does. There is also something about the table which links what seems to be a common cause of both La Rouche and Tea Party supporters(at least of the more pragmatic and incremental Libertarian strain).]
[Process in context[!]? Right On!]
[Final Notes: Hall and Bashir 2B updated (alter or Bane).]

Still in draft?

Here is the preface to something I am torn between chewing and eschewing on.

Rally in Progress?
The following is submitted As Is.

(titled)PARADIGM?
Or Ribble? Hint? Or shifts?
The origins:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the consent of the governed, -- That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

One thought...
[in con text: or (sum)some...regarding the Lord Acton quote about power corrupts the key is in the word "absolute" and regardless if it is the people, some of the people or the sum* of the people]
*an erroneous yet prophetic insert of the link (as in a word divided and short for some thing else)

Bottom Line?

Who gets it?
The line in question is in the last link or post:
"subset of sovereignty or tangle"
But I wonder if Michael Hudson really gets it? Post G-20?
We all know it is about who gets it(materially), but some realize there is a question of values(spiritually) but where we mix things up regards the democracy and economics and a devaluing of politics, and the powers that be.(the people and their relationships) In this regard, I mix the allegory of the egg(Humpty) versus the wall(Dumpty) and working on lowering both rather than breaking or knocking both down. Keeping in mind, the pragmatic and incremental, and the cooperative and the competitive dynamics of the whole process. Given that there is more of a bubble problem than the wall problem when it comes to numbers and the creative derivative situation, it seems that a leak is in order, and that might be in the form of tax reform. AKA: Entitlement reform. (not really AKA, more like biofeedback* wise)
*simply a very complex dynamics
[To sum it up, there is a very interesting exchange on Face the Nation where a new congressman (Rep.-Elect Mike Kelly) presents an interesting "reality": "running" the country in the black (sounds like the country is in business **) vis a vis a gory alley.(a flip-flopped allegory) In an aside it is truly more than about left and right, Democrat and Republican, for it seems the Democrats have been acknowledged to be split in their approach including Obama in terms of being accused of being for or against business(it is not that simple) but the representatives in this exchange are "running" from their party in regards to responsibility,(Michelle Bachmann & Kelly) as they may not have voted along the lines of what their party has, in fact, neither did the Democrats in regard to the compromise on the Bush tax cut extensions. In this case being on the same side, does not make both right or wrong, but only both being there for different reasons.]

** link added 1-24-11

A Funny Thing Happened...

On the Way to the Republic.

This thread was triggered by something Mike Papantonio said, sitting in for Ed Schultz on the Ed Schultz(radio) Show. The trigger is now lost, but it may have been the follow-up to the Class War or as some say, Culture War.

Randi Rhodes is not the funny thing. But I hope to find the serious thing she read on tonights show. But it might better play out on The Last Word with Sam Stein about triggers. [Guy Faux?]
[Allow me to recap: week before last, the president held his joint session on the American Jobs Act, followed last week by his method of payment, followed this week by his long term plans. To sum it up, basically he said, there are 14 months left before the election, let's get something done. The Republicans basically said no way. So instead of bring it on, IT IS ON! BTW: I missed this, but that is for the afore mentioned editing(which I edited).]

MAY 2013 Footnotes Page Two

5-1-13 : Irk Sum is the pun on... Happy May Day!
"carefully" continued: A, B(b), c, D, e, f, G(g), h, I (i)...M(m), N...T

5-6-13 "wiggle room" insert post footnote daylight(b.s.)? [Our Story , Following results.] Knot Now and Richard Engle on AM.

5-10-13 Spinning / off:  A. Mmmm MOW, MOW,  B. Tin Foil Herman, C. R.S.V.P.  /  A. The Read C? , B,  C,  D, E. Simon says..., F. The History of B.S.,  G. What the Beck? // Knot Exactly!

5-15-13 (s.c.) secondary clicks [!] Nietzsche’s Marginal Children: On Friedrich Hayek, The Latvia Illusion, Deficit emergency over.

5-17-13: Further Fodder for... Not to dis defense or commanders ... 

5-30-13: not exactly labelism [?]

True Ledership

No, that is not Leadership, it is the pinnacle of the process.

[9-29-11 Under review re: lede*** (does not require a follow-up as the link morphed) But I am trying to find the lost link This one.]

A lede*** requires a follow-up. Like the constitution has its first three articles or branches of the government, the tetrahedron has its base as a triangle and another dimension, and what is the point? That is political. There are the Legislative, Executive and the Judiciary braches. But what is the point? Or rather the base*?

We the people...

of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

* Oh the humanity
[Another problem? Or anti-pragmatics? The narrative will evolve and involve: Highways or the Low(or No) way. Not to hop the Scotch or translations but...Lock Low Mond?]
["In a perfect world the president ought to wish"...[*]NOT! link(for quote) to be** provided later The Place for Politics.]

** Note: not that I have viewed all the links, but many provide the contrast between progress and anything butT-headism.
[Speaking of Process under-LedeRship.]

*** ledership is not always easy to link: Gunn takes Shot at Alley's Weight.

[Speaking Bane Or Analogies: if spending is the coke, then the debt that Reagan and Bush racked up are illegal debts that need not be paid. Explain that to the defense, healthecare and financial industries(the wealthy) that they need not be paid. In fact, that may actually help regarding the ledership and 2012, if the people realize who the dealers of debt are.]

Delta Dawn


Whose your Daddy?

Rolling Stone. The T[?] (Or the t[!])

[Sum of the some game: War is hard work and progress even more tricky, but a few want(scratch that need) a quick fix.]

[*] [9-21-11 Update: It is regretable that I cannot find the MSNBC segment for the quote above, but as for follow up, pandemonium may be embedded somewhere(not).]

The Read C?

Oar S-curvy... Knot [!]

Pun* on PEG or sum such.

* Un-tie the knot and Ctrl F "lemonade" and dilute the stands.
(Oar: Karl Rove's War / C-quest or... S-curves. / Or Sig-what?)
(FP1)

Ghosh Darn

For Sail?  Dreams. 
Un-Roar Shack?
:::
Gnosh Dim Sum?

(FP$)
[Freudian Ship[?]  O. W.?]
The;;; ... Luminist/Roar Shack(Lob Stir)
Un-Ravel Stein ?

Meta World

Peace Out!

The Lost Obama.
[under construction: there is more to the DBA.]

No, this is not a parting shot. But it is a crack or google at DBA.
I really should not make light of crack pots.



"by crack/key" [!]

Hint: Have your scroll on or click on.

[New MO(or no mo']
[Mo bama Slash Oh-ba-ma]

[Index A and B in progress, Oh Ba Ma ? Irons in the fire, without ironies. Not so fast.

My point of this taxing tangent is the GeOhMeTry* of escalation or not sum game.]
A hint is sometimes in the scroll, over.

[Posted today: This is A, B, C and D. Under D and team[!] there is Will Time.]
[The Process?]
* my pinnacle or bubble theory in regards to Politics, Religion, Economics, and Foreign Relations (more specifically, the values dynamics)

A wonder...

[Finally posted 11-29-11]
Be careful what you wish for. Actually I was just wondering if I alway have the best of intentions. I believe I do. Actually(and the word literally may be the key *) I am usually wondering, and not usually about wishes or intentions. What I was concerned about is not being taken correctly. And that is dangersous with satire, not to mention other's ways with words. I wonder if that is what M(in)M had in mind when he punned his nom de plume.

* some(or sum) might say trigger

I
II

III

IV
V
V

11-22-11
SEGUE OWS: True Footnote now makes three. Missing link(bottom) noted, no pun on evolution. But it is "A wonder..." and Revolution 11-21-11 that suff ice? Draft?(a,b,c,d, e,f,g,h,i,j, k,l,m,n,p,o,q,r, s,t,u) No u v, but up to you. (meta yogurt)

Cain un-Able

Dog gone pizza guy.

I am actually dissappointed that Cain may be un-able to represent the libertarian and wacky right in a prospective general election debate. But who knows.

Meanwhile... beetlejuice, beatle juice, Norman Goldman...podcasting has gone MO(members only).

Speaking of Voodoo or whatever I do do, in rendering and raveling the above ramble I may have met my limit*.

* for under The Big Dig are more links I've yet to count or need to count(11-03-11 or rather find).

[11-03-11: Archive for October 2011 is not all inclusive. Hence** under The Big Dig... Christie endorsed Romney / One Bad Apple / Never the Twain / Spoiler Alert! / Network Paradox- / I Heart OWS! / I'm a PC / Throwing the Game / What, Me Worry? / Take Back the American Dream / Retro-Gate / SEGUE FROM SEPTEMBER(Muffin-Gate)
Prequel*** : Occupy the Koch Brothers Battle Dream Teams]
[Minus Two Finds]
[Lincoln Search O W S]
** random (Xfinity) search of the day "Hence to cato"
***
[If anything can sum up the Voodoo that I do here: If only it were Black and White, or two dimentional or even three. (or fore)(let alone pre-determined. Not to mention Democratic wave theory, and more.]
[WE, in Kind?, or not?]

[Mediatwist? an interesting spin! Dead C Scroll over affirmative Trump. (Satire v. Sat Ire[!])]

SIX SIGMA

SUMS IT UP.
No pun on Zero Sum***, or Raj Patal.
[posted 11-17-11]
Or Sigma(n) Freu d.*

On the other hand, it may depend on whose hand[!]

* not exactly sticking to new 4 mat

** game
Gingrich may be the card.

Zero #Roman#(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l, em,nop a d o p e.)

Sic Sigma? Revisited. And how(the heck) I got here.
It is not about points on a curve, but where (the bleep R we) the heck we are going.
[update labels]
[A Ginrich Typo originally appeared in this piece.]

Give an inch...

Take a footnote:
VOTE NO ON DEAL.If the original intent was a clean bill, this should fit the bill. If harming the economy for political purposes is the intent, then the Debt Deal is the proper balance. While I can understand the political purposes in light of the burden of accountability and compromise, it is a tough call to say, hold tough, but it is your call. My call is that it is not only the 14th Amendment but the Debt Ceiling law itself, which gives the President and Congress their respective powers, which only a no vote would enforce. So while I can understand that Sum Would Cheer: I must on principle urge a No Vote on kicking the can down the road for political purposes. UNLESS it has already been calculated that the obligations that the Treasury holds(f.n. 2) are already not a part of the debt ceiling picture.
Footnote 1
and 2 (except guaranteed obligations held by the Secretary of the Treasury.)

[8-3-11 Obama/Simpson/Bowles follow-up: and interesting Tangent. NFRY files or fries.]

AM Calm PACtification

Is it KBH who suggests on Andrea Mitchell* that the president is not negotiating?
Apparently the end is near[!]
(Ctrl F Nietzsche/End of History)
Not to pun on will or Frederick or Fukuyama,
but a new para-dime, and the summit of our perdicament.

* 9-27-13 Thought so. She held Cruz's seat. The President campaigning, delaying, tweaking.  Ctrl F, "stomach", "framework" but  George F. Will , says complete the neutering.  And I had yet to see his Ike reference.(FP1) c-[!] 9-26 & (O+drama) (FP2) "end"/"is" & C- Ctrl F and cap it toll ization.

 

Brackets and the Debt Clock

[9-26-11 UPDATE: Tax Plan and "Fiscal Terrorism" A slight rearrangement and edit for clarity below. ]

[In might be easier if the links and asterisks are referenced later.***]

The whole issue of cuts over revenues * _ must be sorted out on two fronts. There is the issue of the so-called "progressive" tax code. Then there is the issue of the history of the tax code(see* pun), and how it impacts the debt clock.

The first regards the "Buffet Rule". There are the actual tax bracket rates(10% to 35%), and then there is the effective tax rate, which is further complicated(reduced) by captial gains tax rates(15%). Let us also be reminded that even the richest pay the same rates for their first brackets worth of income,(ZERO), let alone each bracket's worth of income. But since the capital gains tax is most of the income of the bulk of the rich, the effective tax rate will not be the actual sum of each bracket's worth. I will not bother to do some math here, but I hope it is clear. Basically the effective tax rate for the rich are not effective as "progressive" by a look at their brackets. They effectively get a lower tax rate, because capital gains are taxed less than the middle to top income brackets.

Second, there is the matter of the "Debt Clock", which should have its own brackets of sorts. The Bush wars, as well as his Medicare(fix), not to mention his tax cuts are off the clock so-to-speak. Not to mention the economic down turn which should probably reset the clock. If I was able to clarify the first issue, I don't mean to make up for it by complicating the second. But the "spending under borrowing" is more than a pun, it is an economic effect. For now I just mean to address the clock issue. Where I imagine that there could be some way to show previous administration's as well as the current administration's** debt clocks.

Now, I hope that I can get away with not providing more detail. But it is not so simple, as I almost closed the issue. It would not be simply an historical replay of their debt clocks, but a sorting of the debt from their budgets. So we would have several clocks at different brackets in time. This is the matter, where the devil is in the details. This almost becomes a matter for mathematical physicists in regard to the dynamics of budgets and time, in that each bracket in time has potential future impact where political economists would sit in for the mathematical physicists.

But, I hope that it can be imagined that each bracket in time, have two clocks. Their own budget and the debt that was not theirs. I will leave it for real economists or accountants to sort out whether there needs to be more than two, as I don't know if it is just my imagination, or the reality of the difficulty in sorting this out. In this regard, I mean the difficulty of sorting a budget's impact over time. But maybe it can be imagined from the effective impact that war and medicare can have on people and how dynamic that is over time, let alone the setting of tax rates. In fact, that is addressed by one or two instances alone. The Bush tax cuts were temporary. The Bush wars and the Medicare fix were not paid for.



[Please note that the links and image were inserted after completion of this blog post. They include, in order: The New York Times, FOX NEWS, No-Labels, and the Center for American Progress [9-26-11: OurFuture.org], where it was not my intent to lower the level of discourse nor bring more nuanced metaphor to light. But please note my No-Labels comment, in regard to the referees and what is on the table. Not to pun on a game buffet, but the neither the cuts sandwich nor the sand wedged in links were referenced for the writing of this post. But it may be suitable that brackets and clocks are used in games. This is a not so nuanced reference to the sports analogy of politics.]

*which alone needs some economic sorting: I mean "spending under borrowing", to pun a bit.
** oops, a whole new clock issue, why not bracket it by congresses?
*** not to mention by myself

[9-23-11 Update 'nuff s' Ed?] Iron Chef!

[9-29-11 update on timing, see comment 2. Speaking of timing,(darn) lost it for a moment.]

Biff Boom Bam

Platonic Dialogue.

[BTW:(2.0) Scroll down 4 my own See4 bin Laden.]

Current Media and
Super Heroes or C-Quells.

Note: blogspot is having technical difficulties intefering with the previous post being available at this time
(Churned Media makes me... C...(sic) hopes to be available soon, if not, I already have some sequels in the can.)
No pun intended, there is a missing link. Honestly the guildportal link was not heard of or googled prior to my lede, and I had no pow in tension.

NOTE 2.0: Sum Links are anachronistic some are re-runs.

BTW: Not to suggest another sabbatical, but this may be a good calm pend E um.

Un-Exceptionalism

Are there conflicts of interest in economics today?

Undoubtedly[!]
Buy definition and nature.

This may take us back to my Try-UNism, and one, none or all of punderous pondering.
[Mid-post tangent and update.]

No Twain in Try-ing. Well, I did not mean to display un-exceptionalism by example, as in "there he goes again." But my original point was that conflicts of interest are what economics and politics and government are all about. There, is that clear enough?

The "Try-UNism" is a pun in this regard. A sorting of one, none or all. Now, technically the physics might be beyond anyone to say if freedom is a force, and psychologically it may be closer to philosophy for some. But economically, I am saying that without an intent, we will be getting only where we are going, and even that is not a won way street.

My apologies for any missed links or leaps(in your scroll or click-on), but it is an ongoing process. Economics contains and is about conflicts of interest, and politics and government, play crucial rolls for (sum) people.

In regards to my lede, Un-Exceptionalism, I take it from one of the economists, who notes that any field will present conflicts of interest between the professional and the profession or the field if it has a purpose other than the individual. Well, he did not go that far, but I think he could. The "one, none or all" of my tangent relates to Exceptionalism, as it is seen, possibly in that light.

BTW: The first three links are an economic series of videos. Other links may require clicking on and scrolling the link address for a compendium of purpose. For example, "Buy definition and nature". The first two simply reference the ledes. The "be-all-and-end-all" a reference from part 3 of series. The "funny-thing-happened" is a recap of the CW. And regarding "nature" the address is a search of my blog for "Adam+Smith"(without, now with the quotation marks). Skipping over the "Try-UNism" and "Mid-post tangent"(lines) the Twain is deeply embedded in Trying.
[Speaking of exceptions(won): just to be sure.]

[Insert more Ed here and here: enthusiasm gap]

Re:Nexus

Bad Intel.
Greek to sum?
Stochastic(~)Gnostics?

Knot to Re:Cycle ![?]
Clinton Bashir?
The Table ?